A prosecutor had decided that the secret surveillance of a person would be paused. When she later made a decision to resume it again, she was informed that the police had already resumed the surveillance, reports Dagens Juridik.
The police stated that they had resumed the surveillance on their own initiative due to new information. They intended to notify the prosecutor about this afterwards.
According to the Security and Integrity Protection Board, they should have contacted the prosecutor before the decision was made and the board therefore directs criticism at the Police Authority's handling of the case.
