1. What is your most important proposal for reducing carbon dioxide emissions in the short term?
2. Should Sweden stick to the national climate goals until 2030, including the transport goal?
3. Does the reduction obligation need to be increased - and thereby also the price of gasoline - to reduce emissions from transportation?
4. How do you want to get more people to drive electric cars?
5. Do you want to provide government support for new nuclear power?
6. Should the state cover the connection cost for new offshore wind power?
Social Democrats
1. Increase the electrification of transport. Support business by strengthening the Climate Step, the Industrial Step and green credit.
2. Yes
3. Not at the moment. In the short term, S wants to combine requirements for the inclusion of renewables with the state procuring renewable fuels on long-term contracts so that the price is pressured, so-called Sverigebränsle.
4. Broaden support for buying and leasing electric cars, expand the charging infrastructure and make it easier to run heavy traffic on electricity.
5. Yes, but the support should apply to all large-scale fossil-free power, not just nuclear power.
6. Yes, barriers to investment need to be reduced.
Sweden Democrats
1. Focusing on rapid emission reductions leads to ineffective and expensive policies.
2. No
3. No
4. Nothing beyond current policy.
5. Yes, supports the Tidö parties' model.
6. No
The Moderates
1. Continue the expansion of new nuclear power, invest in charging infrastructure, the Climate Step and the Industrial Step.
2. The transport goal should be replaced with an electrification goal and the national goal for 2030 should be aligned with the EU's 2030 target.
3. No
4. Maintain current electric car support and expand charging infrastructure.
5. Yes
6. No
The Centre Party
1. Accelerate the electrification of the vehicle fleet through a broad electric car bonus for everyone. Expand the production of renewable fuels and electricity.
2. Yes
3. No, want to focus on increased production of Swedish, green, cheap fuels, through reduced taxes and production support.
4. Among other things, through electric car bonuses for everyone who buys or leases, expanded charging infrastructure, even for those who live in apartments.
5. No
6. Yes
The Left Party
1. Sweden ticket for 450 kronor per month for public transport and a broad electric car premium. Increased investment in the Climate Step.
2. Yes
3. Yes, but not to the same high levels as before.
4. Introduce a broader electric car premium and significantly expand the charging infrastructure.
5. No
6. Yes
Christian Democrats
1. Reduce fossil fuel dependence and use forests more, for example for biofuels, build more in wood and replace plastic packaging with cardboard.
2. No, Sweden should work in sync with the EU's goals.
3. The reduction obligation may have a role to play, but is currently at a reasonable level.
4. Has already introduced a green car premium and expanded charging infrastructure. Expects that more people will be able to buy used electric cars when the market matures.
5. Yes
6. No
The Green Party
1. Establish a climate investment fund for large investments, for example in railways. Electrify the vehicle fleet and transform agriculture.
2. Yes
3. Yes, in combination with support for those who are dependent on the car and have small margins.
4. Support for the purchase of new and used electric cars, cheap leasing for low-income earners and an extra rural bonus. Reduced tax on electric car charging and expanded charging infrastructure.
5. No
6. Yes
Liberals
1. Broadened electric car premium for those with lower incomes and without access to public transport. Reduced electricity tax on charging, no preferential tax for charging at work and easier charging at apartment buildings.
2. Wants to replace the transport goal with an electrification goal.
3. Yes, a minor increase, but increased electrification is a priority.
4. Possibility to charge tax-free and at home. But hybrids are also needed.
5. Yes
6. Opens up for a risk-sharing model for offshore wind similar to that decided for nuclear power.
