IVO's inspection found shortcomings in 97 percent of the municipalities inspected. Almost nine out of ten need to improve how they handle reports of concern. Two out of three have shortcomings in their checks before children and young people are placed in family homes or privately run businesses.
These are people who are often in a very vulnerable situation, and it is important that society's safety net is as fine-meshed as it is intended to be, says John Ahlberk.
Works well
The reasons why so many of the country's municipalities have shortcomings, to varying degrees and in different areas, have not been examined. But John Ahlberk points out that the country's social services have a comprehensive and complex mission. Some areas are working well.
For example, we see that many municipalities make initial protection assessments when they have reason to do so. We also see that all municipalities say they review the reasons for placing children and young people in, for example, family homes, with the required regularity.
One positive result of the inspection is that several municipalities have started work to make improvements.
All municipalities have reported back to us on the measures they have implemented and plan to implement to address these challenges.
Having an effect
Because the shortcomings have been so extensive and pose such serious risks, the inspection will be followed up.
We will continue to focus on this area. It is important that the efforts the municipalities have reported to us are implemented and have a tangible effect for the children and young people the regulations are intended to protect.
What do you think?